The Leader of the Opposition in the Australian Parliament, Tony Abbot, has labelled the Gillard Government, “the worst government ever”. By any objective test this is not true. What is true, is that the current opposition is demonstratively one of the worst ever.
While the Gillard Government, despite its minority status, has managed to successfully negotiate its way through a massive amount of legislation and skilfully guided our economy through the international financial crisis, Tony Abbott and his team have failed to show that they are capable of taking the reins of government.
From day one Mr Abbott has put all of his efforts into a destructive personal quest to bring about the downfall of the Gillard Government with little thought being put into being prepared to take the reins of government if he were to succeed.
It is very lucky for the Australian nation that Abbott has so far failed to totally destabilise the Government, because the Liberal Opposition have no credible policies on which to base its own governance of the nation and there remains a policy vacuum in most areas.
In particular the Liberal budget is of great concern and appears to have been cobbled together without reference to the spending promises made by Mr Abbott.
The Liberal climate change policy reflects their disregard for the scientific position on global warming impacts. It is blatantly irresponsible and extremely costly both in its direct cost, and because it has not been seriously considered, it would fail to be effective and in doing so would add to the growing ecological and human cost that is already unfolding.
Clearly either Abbott’s budget is a bogus document or he has no intention of implementing most of his policies requiring expenditure. Either way, in the private commercial world this would amount to the commission of a fraud on the Australian public and would put him in jail.
What is difficult to explain is how the Liberals have escaped serious media scrutiny. This lack of scrutiny represents a massive failure across the media spectrum as Abbott has been a hairs breadth away from seizing power since the last election.
If he had succeeded we would have been in deep trouble when he implemented his threadbare un-costed programs. Alternatively, if he faced reality we would have felt cheated that he was reneging on his promises. Either way Tony Abbott’s constant self serving attempts at destabilisation of the Government shows a dangerous disregard for the Australian people that is only matched by our smug and indolent media.
The media let them off the hook every step of the way. The Australian media are worse than useless!
Douglas, I agree with your comment whole-heartedly although they are very effective in preventing important debate on important issues.They are also very effective in promoting singular views as they all parrot the same garbage as each other as if they were presenting us with their own ideas.
Furthermore, many of them set themselves up as expert critics when they no nothing except what the read in another newspaper or heard on television.
JS
I agree with everything written in this story ThusFar.
What i fail to understand is why the SSO’s are still
in the Statute in the Parliament.It just makes a
mockery of Democracy
Jack, I think suspension of standing orders – if that is what you mean by SSOs -are not such a bad thing when a government has total control of both Houses of parliament, as it can enable debate on important issues that might not get up otherwise.This is because governments can control the order of proceedings when they have the numbers. Embarrassing issues may never get to the top of the notice paper. In a minority government they can cause chaos and can be used to delay important reforms.
Thanks for your comment.
jfreos,Thanks for your reply,and yes i did meam Suspension of Standing
Orders,but surely an amendment of SSO’s can stop this from happening
again.Is that possible.
Cheers Jack
Re the suspension of standing orders I think that any member can get up and move that the “member be no longer heard”, and that motion is voted on immediately. This means if the government has the numbers it can immediately curtail any debate on the SSOs. At least that is what happens in state parliaments