the interpretOr

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the proposal “represents the firm conviction of the international community that a just and lasting peace can only come through negotiations between the parties.”

Perhaps Hillary can tell us why the US and The UK Governments and the UN  forgot to consult the resident Palestinian majority when they carved out a new country for homeless European Jews in Palestine. Those dispossessed Palestinians whose families had lived there for centuries  can only believe this is a clear double standard and another obstacle thrown up by desperate governments who have no desire for a fair resolution of an injustice they created. If Hillary does believe 50 years of negotiations are not enough, why will she not genuinely push for and impose sanctions against further theft of Palestinian land through the Israeli Government backed settlement program?

The world is now becoming aware that there is no intention to allow a Palestinian State by either the Israeli or the US Governments who are instead pursuing the gradual and stealthy elimination of the Palestinian Race to cater to the illogical demands of the extreme and fundamental Jewish groups who are in control of the Israeli Government agenda. As these extremist Jewish groups are out breeding non secular Jews at a ratio near 8 to 1 there is an urgent need for the world to deal fairly and firmly with Israel before the Middle East becomes the scene of an nuclear Armageddon.

At a time when the reputation of the United States of America as an economic superpower has being exposed, it has also been totally and irrevocably exposed as supporting an unjust moral fraud. In vetoing the Palestinian bid for statehood, President Barrack Obama has taken the blindfold from the statue of Justice and placed it firmly on the eyes of the statue of Liberty.       

Despite all the pathetic excuses about Palestinians not being ready for statehood, the US veto of a Palestinian State shows clearly that American justice is not imparted without favour and that the liberty can only won by violence. For all those in the USA who have wondered what drove the appalling suicidal act of mass murder on September 11, look no further than the genocidal treatment of the Palestinian people that has gone on for a lifetime.

Even as the undemocratic and compromised UN meets to decide the fate of a people with no voice, the Palestinians continue to be imprisoned in their own land. They are subject to summary execution and collectively punished. Furthermore, every day more Palestinians are being illegally driven off their land and their homes are destroyed by the “settlers”, a nice word used to describe violent secular and largely foreign land thieves backed by a secular state with little regard for international law. All this is allowed by the UN without any meaningful action to protect the Palestinian’s human rights.

It should be remembered that in carving out a secular state in Palestine, the UN was in breach of its own charter as the people of Palestine were not polled or the will of the majority considered.

The UN is not a democratic organisation and each passing day begins to look more and more like the propaganda tool and star chamber to wrongly accuse, falsely convict and unjustly sentence those countries of the South that resist the will of the West . Each one of a select handful of superpowers can independently veto decisions made by even a huge majority of countries. It is a shameful injustice that countries that have the support of one superpower can escape sanction for terrible war crimes and be able to expand atomic arsenals without question, while other countries are bombed into oblivion for lesser crimes or even on the basis of rumours and lies.

The ridiculous proposition underpinning this tragic farce is a mirage in that very few countries including the United Kingdom, the United States, Italy France Germany, Russia, China or even Australia have had to ask permission of the UN to be recognised as states. Herein lays the essence of the problem. It is the Middle Eastern countries undemocratically carved up by Western powers and set up as compliant undemocratic pseudo states that need this fraudulent endorsement of the UN. The fundamental cause of current conflicts in the Middle East is that the wishes and rights of the vast majority of citizens in this region have been trampled on by the oil hungry superpowers for just one reason and that is to maintain their strategic control of an essential resource. When the citizens of these countries are able to rid themselves of the despots and puppet regimes installed by the West as appears to be happening right now, the West must face up to its greatest lie, that is the proposition that it supports democracy for all and that its interventions are for the common good. Furthermore, it is clear that conflict or more accurately a lack of unity between Arab states suits the Western agenda.

The people of Western nations and especially those of the United States need to wake up that their governments are betraying them and that they too are being exploited and killed on battlefields to maintain an exploitative regimen that holds back our civilisation from achieving great advances in the well-being of the people of all nations. Until we demand justice for all there will be no lasting peace and the next to be denied justice may be us.

The Australian Government and the Opposition are covering up for some of the worlds biggest people smugglers who are responsible for sneaking more than 90% of illegal immigrants into Australia.

These people smugglers are making millions of dollars for transporting thousands of illegals into Australia right under the nose of immigration department officers. The InterpretOr has decided to make a stand against this cruel trade by naming the people smugglers.

The most notorious of these offenders are Quantas, British Airways, Malaysian and Singapore Airlines along with Virgin and KLM. We demand the Government takes immediate action to prosecute these offenders who are bringing in around 50,000 illegals every year.

The interpretOr has covered issues of the public interest since our inception a few months ago. We would ask our visitors and readers to consider whether the following perspectives that we’ve examined were offered by News Ltd, Seven Media Group and other mainstream Australian media over this same period? To cite a few interpretOr pieces thus far…

• a series of articles on press freedom from a variety of perspectives (Obama, Reporters Without Borders…)
• the selling of Blair’s dodgy dossier that led countries to war and the invasion of Iraq (an odious dictatorship, yet sovereign state)
• the plight of refugees as described by those unfortunate enough to have actually fled their homeland and the carnage of the Taliban
• the soft sell of detention centre contractor, Serco, across ‘community’ newspapers
• the massive profits of Serco and the Ferrari fetish of its UK based CEO
• the objective evidence sourced from Nobel Laureate economists, Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz on the causes and characteristics of economic crises and cycles
• the exposure of the falsehood of the “Big government BAD…small government GOOD” gobbledegook….errrr, there’s no correlation
• the evidence based conflict of interest of the ‘ratings agencies’ and US Senate 2011 conclusions and response
• the impact of Murdoch’s incursion into the UK Times and Sunday Times
• the connection between successive PMs in the UK, and now Australia, and Murdoch and his acolytes
• the connection between the Gammell family, Tony Blair, George W Bush and Seven West Media
• a satirical series deconstructing and exploring the absurdity of the status quo and appalling behaviour of Dumsfeld et al
• to borrow a term from Chomsky…uncovery of significant evidence of “THE MANUFACTURE of CONSENT”

If most or all of the above were absent from your regular media diet, then perhaps it’s time for us, the public, to stand up and demand an inquiry into media ownership here in Australia. As stated in our ‘about’ statement….objectivity cannot serve two masters. Market based media and the public interest are not congruent.