Category: thus far…


the interpretOr wishes to share perspectives on press freedom and to get the ball rolling, here’s Barack Obama on World Press Freedom Day

“In every corner of the globe, there are journalists in jail or being actively harassed: from Azerbaijan to Zimbabwe, Burma to Uzbekistan, Cuba to Eritrea…I lend my voice of support and admiration to all those men and women of the press who labour to expose truth and enhance accountability around the world.

In so doing, I recall the words of Thomas Jefferson:

“The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right: and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”

(Barack Obama, May 2009)

the interpretOr would like to add that Obama should remember these remarks before embarking upon any extradition of Julian Assange – surely Wikileaks was motivated by a desire to “expose truth and enhance accountability around the world” too.

the interpretOr encourages visitors to this site to share their perspectives on this timely and crucial subject. 

Please feel free to comment away…we also wish to advise that we have a mobile compatible app that can be accessed through Android and also iPhone.

The setting is chilling. London is burning, the Greeks are looking for friends and Berlusconi has finally screwed everything in Italy. Meanwhile at the tea party,  the Mad Hatters cheer the fall of America’s President and the impoverishment of her people. In this tottering world precariously held above the flood of despair by the great plate of China, Mr Rabbit, a cousin of the Mad March Hare, returns to Canberra to plot the demise of Ms Carrot Top. Will Mr Rabbit be satisfied with a moderate level of carnage or will he wreak havoc on the great warren Downunder?

Mr Rabbit has taken time out to consult with the ferrets from the Tea Party on how a complete extinction might be carried out. Will he be thwarted by the Ugly Duckling who is trying hard to boost morale and steer Downunder through this crisis? Or will Tony 1080 poison the earth and take us back to the Dark Ages? Watch this space for updates.

Following the meeting between Prime Minister Julia Gillard and News limited editors and directors there has been a remarkable change in the tone of “The Australian”. Previous editions have relentlessly painted the PM as a train wreck driving Australia into certain calamity. This weekend edition of the 6th of August has transformed her into the very picture of a serenely wise leader totally in control of the country as described by Mathew Franklin.

“Ms Gillard exuded optimism as she spoke of focusing on an agenda aimed at spreading opportunity and addressing people’s sense of uneasiness about the patchwork economy”.

A large glamour photograph was titled “A subtle sartorial shift shows a sleekly confident Julia Gillard”

Now what magical words were spoken to CEO John Hartigan that bought about his metamorphis from the aggressive flesh eating maggot to the gentle butterfly wanting to fly with Lepidoptera Gillardis to bring beauty and colour into the world? Could those transformative words have been “media inquiry”?
Such transformations do not happen without some evolutionary payback, so what was the price paid by our PM? Only the editors, executives and the flies on the wall can know for sure what price the transaction required. To outside observers the only thing of value is the canning of the media inquiry. Of course, now that the owner of News Limited has declared himself to be family Murdochus Americanus his territorial spread is limited in this country by laws which previously seem to have been cravenly ignored by local herd leaders who fearful of retribution have looked in another direction. It would be a disaster for the family Murdochus if an inquiry forced the local herd leaders to face up to their responsibility to the Family Australis and drive out alien invader.

the interpretOr has given focus to the ratings agency issue because they have massive influence that impacts directly on any notion or reality of the social good.

The world was turned into an enormous market by the forces of Reagan, Thatcher and their successors, and a continuum was born – Murdoch and other major media players provided a fanfare for the idiotic falsehood of Big government BAD…’free’market GOOD’, and the ratings agencies were pivotal to this new realpolitik and to this day, still wield corrosive power.

Ratings agencies were  at the dark heart of the subprime fiasco that resulted in the 2008 collapse of Lehmann Brothers and the subsequent global financial meltdown. Why this should still be a concern to those of us with no particular interest in the minutiae of economics, is that this corrupt, venal complicity (ie. awarding worthless financial products and instruments credit worthiness) has had an enormous impact on the ability of governments around the world to provide for the sick, the poor and the elderly.

Nobel winning economists, Joseph Stiglitz (prof. of Economics @ Columbia University), and Paul Krugman (professor of Economics and International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University) have analysed the economic data behind the idea that ‘Big Government’ was responsible for down turns, recessions and associated perceptions that only the Right can lay claim to financial responsibility and concluded independently and unanimously that there is absolutely no data to support these beliefs. 

In other words, there is no evidence that economic decline or instability is caused by social welfare. The real villain of the piece is the systematic deregulation of the finance sector and the activities of its ‘big swinging dicks’, namely S&P, Moody’s and Fitch.

(see more perspectives at:    www.josephstiglitz.com/ and…http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/ )

ps. I remember as a kid in England that the first thing Thatcher did upon becoming Prime Minister was to abolish free school milk. I’m obviously not over     that one. Anyway, truth is often stranger than fiction.

Wow, that’s sooo reassuring…perhaps ‘News’ missed the US Senate report cited by the interpretOr…then again, maybe they didn’t…

Is the interpretOr alone in wondering, why the silence in Oz and elsewhere re the ratings agencies’ inherent conflict of interest and their culpability re the sovereign debt crisis engulfing Europe?

This morning’s Wall St Journal (Murdoch owned)  had plenty of splashes on impending market losses, and debate over S&P’s downgrading of US credit rating, but not a murmur re the elephant, (by now crapping all over the shop), in the room – they are paid BLOODY ENORMOUS COMMISSIONS BY THE PRODUCERS of THE PRODUCTS THAT THEY RATE!

Mork calling Orson, come in please Orson, Mork calling Orson…?

“All the corruption exposed in England – payoffs, dirty cops, hush-money settlements – is also happening here” (Rolling Stone, Aug 2011)

   http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/rupert-murdochs-american-scandals-20110803

The Obama administration attacked the credibility of the analysis underlying Standard & Poor’s decision to downgrade the United States’ top credit rating on Friday, saying it had found a $2 trillion error. (Reuters)

The interpretOr has accessed an April 2011 US Senate report that specifies a host of factors responsible for the inaccurate credit ratings issued by Moody’s and S&P:

‘One significant cause was the inherent conflict of interest arising from the system used to pay for credit ratings. Credit rating agencies were paid by the Wall Street firms that sought their ratings and profited from the financial products being rated. Under this “issuer pays” model, the rating agencies were dependent upon those Wall Street firms to bring them business, and were vulnerable to threats that the firms would take their business elsewhere if they did not get the ratings they wanted.’

The rating agencies weakened their standards as each competed to provide the most favorable rating to win business and greater market share. The result was a race to the bottom.

source:

United States Senate PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

Carl Levin, Chairman Tom Coburn, Ranking Minority Member

WALL STREET AND THE FINANCIAL CRISIS:

Anatomy of a Financial Collapse

MAJORITY AND MINORITY STAFF REPORT

PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS

UNITED STATES SENATE

April 13, 2011

Click to access FinancialCrisisReport.pdf

Guardian, BBC & Reuters reporting that Italian Police have raided Milan offices of ratings agencies Moody’s and also Standard & Poor’s…accountability, anyone?

…Guantanamo: “nOw open for business” 

BBC World Service correspondent in New York, prefacing his piece on plunging markets with a thumbnail of the ratings agencies scene – there are only 3 major players (Standard & Poor’s – S&P, Moody’s and Fitch) and they rate the world’s bonds and derivatives – but omitting an essential piece of information:

Listeners were not told that these same ratings agencies derive their primary, if not sole revenue stream, from the commission that they are paid by the merchant banks and governments that are issuing the bonds that they, the ratings agencies, rate.

Err, herein lies an inherent contradiction – a whopping great, objective conflict of interest. In late 2010, a Eurobond dealer broke away from the conformist consensus of his peers and spoke out against the ratings agencies…

This lone voice had made it onto the BBC World Service and clearly stated that the ratings that these agencies had given toxic Greek, Spanish and Irish sovereign debt were incorrect. He ‘called’ these government bonds as sub-junk trash. He derided the ratings as being as fetid as the subprime ‘miscalculations’ of 2008 and earlier.

serco – latest news dashboard.

“The distaste at the phone hacking scandal in Britain is more an aesthetic and news judgment than an ethical one”

  (The Australian, 02 Aug 2011)

The distaste in Britain is better described as outright repulsion. The Australian takes a contemptuous view of the sense and sensibilities of the UK public.

  • There has long been ‘distaste’ for the way in which News tabloids and broadsheets in the UK played a pivotal role in promoting and selling Gulf War II. Their role is even explicitly acknowledged in leaked USAF papers re ‘Strategic Influence, Perception Management & Psych Ops in Gulf II’ (2003).
  • There has long been ‘distaste’ in the UK for the way in which Murdoch formed an unholy alliance with Margaret Thatcher – echoes of elements of the interpretOr’s coverage of the current scandal (see ‘Cameron’s Christmas Lunch‘) as Rupert joined Maggie for successive Christmas stays at PM retreat, Chequers.
  • There has long been ‘distaste’ for the systematic dumbing down and overt politicisation of the Times and Sunday Times
  • There has long been ‘distaste’ in the UK for the demonisation of miners and steel workers that dared to stand up for themselves and their communities
  • There has long been ‘distaste’ for successive generations of the Murdoch family smearing the role and standing of the BBC

There is now also outright repulsion over deceit, arrogance and chicanery.

The BBC World Service, though current, considered and topical, still had a slight aura of antiquity for Keith. The locations of bureaux a poignant reminder of its scope across this earth: Tokyo, Seoul, Beijing to Delhi and west across the old Silk Road, back to Bush House, London – an image formed in Keith’s mind’s eye of RKO radio pylons bleeping into monochrome clouds and a slight cosmic haze. No wonder radio has been described as “the theatre of the mind.” Orson Welles’ War of the Worlds, the Archers…The King’s Speech. Did video really kill the radio star? mused Keith.

The first report he caught was from a BBC correspondent in New York, prefacing his interview with a thumbnail of the ratings agencies scene – there are only 3 major players (Standard & Poor – S&P, Moody’s and Fitch) and they rate the world’s bonds and derivatives – but omitting an essential piece of information:

Listeners were not told that these same ratings agencies derive their primary, if not sole revenue stream, from the commission that they are paid by the merchant banks and governments that are issuing the bonds that they, the ratings agencies, rate.

Err, herein lies an inherent contradiction – a whopping great, objective conflict of interest. “Bloody great elephant in the proverbial!” Keith recalled that in late 2010, a Eurobond dealer broke away from the conformist consensus of his peers and spoke out against the ratings agencies. This lone voice had made it onto the BBC World Service and clearly stated that the ratings that these agencies had given toxic Greek, Spanish and Irish sovereign debt were incorrect. He ‘called’ these government bonds as sub-junk trash. He derided the ratings as being as fetid as the subprime ‘miscalculations’ of 2008 and earlier.

Mr Gray’s thoughts then drifted momentarily to Dumsfeld, Harridan et al…the Melbourne conference…self raising or plain?…only to be jolted back to the radio by the announcement of the next item on the air, an interview with Norman Boyd, CEO of The Corrections Corporation, (FTSE: CorrectCorp). He visualised an orange-tanned, bouffanted grinning suit, arm around the shoulder of orange-tanned ‘Sir Cliff’ on the Barbados plantation, with orange-tanned Bliar and the obsequious (and orange-tanned) Mandelson. Boyd en vacances…and not too far away from Cuba…

Comment on CorrectCorp’s stellar performance on the London markets and the increasingly ubiquitous Boyd segwayed into the first question:

“Norman Boyd, welcome to Hard Cash…Could you describe for our listeners the relationship between your spiritual foundations – your Evangelism – and your sense of duty to shareho…”

The interpretOr’s London media contacts have confirmed that Serco’s CEO, Chris Hyman, is an evangelical Christian with a penchant for racing Ferraris, and received a 2010 pay package of more than £5 million.

The Serco corporate strap line is “Bringing service to life.”

Errr, for Mr Hyman, make that self service…

(wonder what Keith Gray thinks about all this?)

The interpretOr recently saw large advertisements in local ‘community’ newspapers for private asylum centre management provider, ‘Serco’. The copy describes this organisation as ‘Living, thinking, acting locally’…and the creative is a photo of a smiling, twinkling Serco employee with a caption that describes his passion for weekend hockey and an invitation to find out more about what a sweet guy ‘Graham’ is by going to http://www.youtube.com/sercoaustralia

How cuddly.

Examination of Serco’s 2010 financial results in their own annual report as follows:

Serco Group plc – 2010 Results 12 months to 31 December – profit before tax – £213.9 Million

% change YOY: 20.8%

The perspective of the interpretOr is that our community should also be presented with objective information about Serco, rather than the fiction of soft advertising that is attempting to humanise institutionalised misery for money.

HSU & inpublichands.com.au June emailer gives the Serco strap line/brand proposition “Bringing service to life” a whole new meaning…

“And a month ago we announced the discovery of a report by an independent UK inspectorate into a hospital in Scotland run by Serco. During  that inspection 6 of the 8 wards failed basic hygiene standards.

(More perspectives at  www.inpublichands.com.au)

Meanwhile, on a Boketese beach sits Ronald Dumsfeld. Fresh from the disgrace of dismissal, he is ‘regrouping’, Long Island Iced Tea in hand, chain-smoking Winston reds and barking into his satellite phone, like the mad dog that he truly is. Almost biting the pool waiter with his rage over a disappointing Hawaiian burger, he snarls… “Extra cheese, god damn you, and make it snappy…Harridan! what’s with those god damn socks of yours!?”

It was alleged that Dummy, in addition to his recent transgressions, is a good friend of the island’s autocratic, military dictator, Madeh Kikimongulat. Wondering at the moment if there’s anything in that? Funnily enough, it’s “election time” here soon too. Could Dumsfeld be taking more than just a stopover en route to Oz, and if so, just what is he up to?

When Dumsfeld was an assistant secretary at the State Department, back in ‘showbiz Ron’s’ eighties reign, incubating the present batch of rabid neo-cons, his domain included Boket and other areas within South East Asia. He certainly notched up the airmiles in his role as regional chief of police/arms sales and oil and gas procurement in his famed flared safari suit and stupendously gruff demeanour. In fact, ‘demeaning’ was and is mad dog Dumsfeld’s signature.

Although he avoided the slings and arrows, carpet bombing and general ugliness of the Vietnam campaign, Dumsfeld had never missed the opportunity to rally the troops. At that time, Kikimongulat occupied a similar, though more domestically focused, role as Minister of the Interior. ‘Brutish, narcissist’ was how many remembered him. Master of Bugger All speak with the General Electric Corp bigwigs, followed by a wind down harassing “unruly workers” in the country’s sweatshops. If island hopping, he’d bring a few along and toss them out of his aircraft. The smaller the island, the bigger the challenge for the oafish tyrant, but a direct hit on a rocky peninsula was often occasion for another Veuve and recording-studio sized line. Never sure whether the GE execs ever accompanied him on these sorties, but rumour has it that Dumsfeld was rather taken with the ‘archipelago’ game too, but demanded Wild Turkey as his accompaniment.

Hope the resort gets the next Hawaiian burger right, mused Ben Harridan. “Hey, I’m on assignment…err, Ron…and in the tropics – open toed sandals are actually much, much more functional with the accompaniment of socks. Even John and Janette agreed when we were on their final CHOGM. Heck, if I’m relaxed about ’em, then surely…”

Keith finished his snippet on the iPhone vs Gadaffi.

He then read this very irritating article in the right-wing national newspaper, The Caucasian, about Ronald Dumsfeld’s forthcoming visit to Melbourne, written by the bearded foreign editor, Ben Harridan. “Bloody Bush apologist, neo con…’mates’ with Bliar and mouthpiece to Toad of Toad Hall himself, that shell-suited walking flag with the glasses.”

Dumsfeld too still disturbed the hell out of Keith. Down with the flu a few months back, he’d re-watched House of Bush for the umpteenth time, but had pressed black+white on the remote when Dumsfeld was featured. He had then imagined that Dummy was speaking in German. One long segment on Guantanamo had cage shots interspersed with his demented justifications – snarling, arrogant, sociopathic, rimless spectacles….sweaty eyelids like fried bacon rinds.

Errr, it’s 2011 and Eichmann is alive and well and living in DC. Banality of Evil – again. Nothing banal about its’ consequences right now. Ask the orange cage men of Cuba.  Ohh, but you can’t…and neither can I.

“Now that brutish, neoCON bastard certainly deserves a good caking” muttered Keith as he suddenly realised that the solution to several of life’s particularly niggling problems lay in his fridge and flour tin…“I bake therefore I am”

Below Harridan’s swooning Dummy piece…a creepy looking, famous actor is trying to sell newspaper readers expensive watches, on the basis that he has this extraordinary hidden talent…the watch on his wrist, with its dials and buttons, is the signifier of this talent. Keith was thinking, “could it be timed Meccano construction …? Flying model airpl…

In following the debate, sorry make that the farce, surrounding the passing of the US budget I have gone to the Tea Party Policy paper, also known as “Alice in Wonderland”, for advice.

I would like your opinion on which quote best describes the situation?

1.

“Alice laughed. ‘There’s no use trying,’ she said. ‘One can’t believe impossible things.’

I daresay you haven’t had much practice,’ said the Queen. ‘When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast. There goes the shawl again!”
— Lewis Carroll

2.

“No, no! The adventures first, explanations take such a dreadful time.”
— Lewis Carroll (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass)

3.

“Take care of the sounds and the sense will take care of itself.”
— Lewis Carroll (The Annotated Alice: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland & Through The Looking Glass)

4.

“Yes, that’s it! Said the Hatter with a sigh, it’s always tea time.”
— Lewis Carroll (Alice in Wonderland)

“How puzzling all these changes are! I’m never sure what I’m going to be, from one minute to another.”
— Lewis Carroll (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
5.
“When I used to read fairy-tales, I fancied that kind of thing never happened, and now here I am in the middle of one!”
— Lewis Carroll
6.
“Alice came to a fork in the road. ‘Which road do I take?’ she asked.
‘Where do you want to go?’ responded the Cheshire Cat.
‘I don’t know,’ Alice answered.
‘Then,’ said the Cat, ‘it doesn’t matter.”
— Lewis Carroll
7.
“It would be so nice if something made sense for a change.”
— Lewis Carroll
8.

“In another moment down went Alice after it, never once considering how in the world she was to get out again.”
— Lewis Carroll (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland)

9.

“Reeling and Writhing of course, to begin with,’ the Mock Turtle replied, ‘and the different branches of arithmetic-ambition, distraction, uglification, and derision.”
— Lewis Carroll (Alice in Wonderland: Including Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass)

10.

“There is a place, like no place on earth. A land full of wonder, mystery, and danger. Some say, to survive it, you need to be as mad as a hatter. Which, luckily, I am.”
— Lewis Carroll

11.

“Well that was the silliest tea party I ever went to! I am never going back there again!”
— Lewis Carroll (Alice in Wonderland)

Misinformation is the enemy of our society. Phone tapping and computer hacking is not the main problem with Australian media. The lack of objectivity, fairness and depth is.  In a recent trip to Indonesia, one of the most surprising and outstanding cultural differences I found was in the honesty of their major newspapers. My poor knowledge of Indonesian culture and media had been informed by news stories in our own press. I had expected a tame media cowed by the military and government. However the opposite was true as the newspapers vigorously pursued corrupt and incompetent members of parliament and had no fear of analysing the weakness of the President. All this was done without alarmist rhetoric or a partisan start-point.

Even more impressive is the way important issues are presented for discussion and the depth of information being provided to readers. Reading the Jakarta Post and the inserted China Daily has been a fascinating educational experience. A good example is a recent article by Economics Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz on the structural weakness imposed on the US budget by policies of the Tea Party faction of the Republican Party, and how the adoption of similar policies is exacerbating the economic chaos of struggling members of the European Community. The article cuts through the neo- conservative mumbo jumbo economics that is holding back progress here and abroad. The China Daily contained a comprehensive, highly informative, interesting and well researched feature on the economic impact of ageing on the countries of the region.

In stark contrast, there is shallowness and partisan viewpoint in Australian news-media that is both disappointing and alarming. Most time and space is given to trivia while important issues are rarely discussed in-depth by try-hard media figures for whom celebrity is more important than substance. Even the Australian Broadcasting Commission is moving down this path.

Rather than increasing understanding and adding meaning to our lives, our media sets out to distort the truth. Instead of analysis and reasoning we are given marketing propaganda backed up by shallow opinions. Invariably these opinions are laced with derisive and inaccurate school bully clichés like “Carbon Cate” to attack and label those who dare to express an alternative view. These clichés are chanted across publications and the broadcast networks like a deafening morning chorus of moronic cicadas, shocked that sun is coming up but having no understanding why it is once again appearing on the horizon.

The revered elder statesmen and women of the press paddle safely in the shallows of mediocrity. They appear on our weekend newspapers and television screens pontificating on issues after being spoon fed their lines by political spin doctors with whom they are far too close for our comfort. To further indoctrinate readers and viewers, we are harangued by sainted business leaders winging against some perceived threat to his short-term wealth. Any new ideas or concepts that challenge the current orthodoxy are treated with suspicion and usually ridicule. Criticism of these new concepts does not come from a basis of careful analysis, but instead it arises from ignorance and the fear of being moved out of an intellectual comfort zone.

Serious life threatening issues like climate change are not covered by journalists with some expertise or knowledge in the field, but by business and economics writers and by journalist members of the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), which is actually a lobby group for private industry posing as a scientific think tank.  However when these double agent journalists are confronted by an indestructible wall of scientific evidence there is a denial of the mainstream scientific view and a parade of views from cash for comment shock jocks, crackpot “experts” and bleating billionaires protecting their money piles and their right to pollute. While these same people laud Australian sporting heroes for being ahead of the pack, when it comes to business and the environment, being in front of the world is a sacrilege

It is clear that the intent of most publications and broadcasts is primarily to promote consumerism, push business interests, and to campaign against anything that threatens either of these. Any long-term sustainable proposal is put in the too hard basket by an industry lacking in principles and that has forgotten its true purpose.

Hacking is not damaging Australia; partisan, mean-spirited inane spin that is pumped out as information is.

John Whittingdale, the Conservative chairman of the Culture, Media and Sport select committee of the House of Commons (UK) is facebook friends with Elisabeth Murdoch, reveals The Independent. He’s also been a close pal of good ol’ Les Hinton, Murdoch’s right hand man of 40 years. Will they still be on first name terms tomorrow?

Christmas 2010, David Cameron had a festive lunch at the home of Rebekah Brooks,  also in attendance was her  then boss, James Murdoch…oh, and Elisabeth Murdoch and Matthew Freud too. Cosy…(see earlier interpretOr posts mid 2011)

June 2012 and Old Etonian, ex Carlton Communications PR man, David Cameron PM is before the Leveson inquiry.

Just how was that lunch, David Cameron?

In addition to Brooks’s arrest, Guardian and also Sunday Telegraph (London) are reporting that Scotland Yard investigating James Murdoch. UK PM, David Cameron, has had frequent and repeated meetings with them and other senior News figures, including Rupert Murdoch, and Andy Coulson (after the latter’s resignation as Cameron’s Director of Communications – whoopsee). There is also growing evidence cited by Reuters, CNN and other media, that the Chair of Tuesday’s Common’s Select Committee is a pal of Coulson’s…watch this space…

“She (Brooks) was arrested on suspicion of conspiring to intercept communications, contrary to Section1(1) Criminal Law Act 1977 and on suspicion of corruption allegations contrary to Section 1 of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906.” Metropolitan Police, 17 July 2011

Daily Telegraph (London) is reporting that David Cameron turning back in the air from South Africa to UK – there is growing speculation that he is very, very exposed…

(Oh, and why not Google ‘David Cameron, Matthew Freud and Elisabeth Murdoch’…where were they on Christmas Day 2010?)

Times Up?

“Early in 1982, ten months after he had taken over The Times and The Sunday TimesRupert Murdoch went to see the Prime Minister, Mrs Thatcher. They shared a problem: it was me. I was editor of The Times and Murdoch’s difficulty was how to dispose of me.”

 
  ‘Good Times, Bad Times’, Harold Evans (Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd, 1983)
 

Fast forward 30 years…it might be Rupert’s turn.

Harold Evans was a brave and conscientious editor of The Sunday Times when it was a great, compelling and fearless Fleet Street newspaper. Among his achievements are the creation and dynamic development of their investigative team, Insight. Using energy and talent on behalf of children stricken by latent effects of the toxic Thalidomide drug – a sleeping pill that pregnant mothers had used before the children were born, resulting in limbless babies and many hundreds with chronic deformities – the Insight Team exposed and challenged the pitiful compensation that families involved had received. It also sought to inform readers of the objective, evidence based realities of how the pharmaceutical company that manufactured and distributed the Thalidomide drug reacted to the terrible and delayed reaction of their monstrous and widely used pill. Within the scope of their investigation was intense examination and analysis of the legal machinations on this intergenerational disaster – the position of the Courts and the paucity of the advocacy on behalf of the prescribed poison’s victims. Evans and his staff were driven by the magnitude of their sense of professionalism and responsibility to society. They were acting solely in the public good and in the unadulterated pursuit of justice and recompense for suffering children and parents.

Fast forward 30 years and we’re at another turning point. The demise of The News of The World and the circumstances of its destruction are a continuation of the process that Murdoch set in motion back in ’82 with his acquisition of the Times broadsheets and subsequent dismissal of Harold Evans. That such towering newspapers succumbed to substantially diminished credibility, authenticity and authority was an incremental, and at times subtle, process. Murdoch had an agenda of intense engagement and promotion of both Thatcher in the UK and ‘showbiz Ron’ in the US, and Evans did not fit this mould, this new realpolitik. Would Evans have allowed the Insight Team to become cheerleaders for Milton Friedman and run away, unchecked corporate power? I think not.

Would Harold Evans have allowed The Sunday Times to obfuscate and mislead over Iran Contra and ignore the systematic destruction of the Roosevelt and Beveridge initiated social reforms in public health and education – defining elements of the social contract of the post WW2 era? Well, ask the victims of Thalidomide.

At one end of the chronology is analysis, context and enquiry; at the other…propaganda, churnalism and the stench of sleaze. Hope versus fear. We deserve the former.

“the revolution will not be televised” sung the late, great Gil Scott-Heron.

It will be on your iPhone, though.

© jfreos 

Gaddafi just doesn’t get it. Disconnected literally and metaphorically. The paucity of his awareness of this momentous shift in communications will be his undoing. His reasoning is “they’re all crazy”. But where are your clothes, emperor? All too recently rehabilitated and propped up again by the bastardly B’s – Bliar and Berlusconi, with their spooky and suspect Libyan shenanigans. Carnage in the present moment, meted out by Gaddafi’s interior troops and mercenaries; victims of Lockerbie lurking in the shadows of our consciousness.

The blindspot for Gaddafi today – the rapidly diminishing effectiveness of dictatorial social power dynamics in the face of increasingly ubiquitous digital media. Just before Christmas, a BBC correspondent reported from a busy Kabul street , describing the smart phone as “The Swiss Army Knife of the 21st C”. Only months later, change sweeping North Africa and the Middle East makes this pocket knife seem more like a sophisticated, nuanced battering ram – an animate object.

An antidote to tyranny.

Kronic Dependency

Kronic Dependency

Following the lead of the Barnett Government in Western Australia, all Australian states are moving to ban “Kronic”, a type of synthetic marijuana that is being sold legally throughout Australia online and in tobacconists and news agents.

While this prohibition is not surprising in Western Australia, where the Minister for police Rob Johnson is gaining fame for his paranoiac stance to law and order that not only punishes perpetrators but also innocent bystanders. Furthermore, the ban is also closely linked to reports that mineworkers were using Kronic  while at work. The Premier who was the executive director of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry will not let anything get in the way of the mining industry in Western Australia.

The principal but not principled reason given for banning Kronic is that it is harmful to health and impairs people’s judgement and perception. Exactly the same issues that crop up with alcohol and tobacco. Whenever health experts and others concerned about the massive impact of alcohol and tobacco ask for them to be banned, the stock reply from is that it is too hard to ban tobacco or alcohol in the same way as heroin, marijuana and amphetamines, because the liquor and cigarette industries are legal industries in Australia.

The banning of Kronic which was a legal business therefore creates a precedent and poses the question, “why not also ban booze and cigarettes?”.  It could be argued as a benefit of legal liquor is that there is a strong locally owned wine and brewing industry employing many Australians, but cigarettes are imported and are not an Australian owned industry.

The one group which benefits from the sale of cigarettes in Australia is the Australian Liberal Party which is the worlds largest beneficiary of election funding from tobacco companies. To borrow a line from the late Peter Cooke, the tobacco companies told the Liberal Party “we admire integrity and we are prepared to pay for it”. The message is there for the party drug industry, include political donations in your promotional budgets.

 

Afghan refugee, Arif Ruhani, shared his harrowing story with me in 2009. In April of that year there was a burning boat near Ashmore reef that reignited debate on refugee policy and responses. Then Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, acknowledged that deteriorating conditions, particularly in countries like Afghanistan and Sri Lanka, were causing people to flee their homelands. 

Perhaps we need to ask ourselves as human beings, what would it be like for us if we awoke to the armies of the night? What would we do if we were no longer safe due to sporadic acts of violence, murder on our doorstep? What steps would we take to try and survive the carnage? What would we do to protect those that we love? We may find answers to some of these fundamental human questions in Arif’s candid and courageous account:

Arif Ruhani’s story begins in Afghanistan in 2001 when the Taliban seized control of Oruzgan Province. This was not a unified event as Mujahedeen factions were fighting between each other  for power and populations were being murdered. His family became homeless and were displaced from village to village.

“We were trying to lead a ‘normal life’ after the Taliban came in to power and then the whole thing changed. The threat to our life was more imminent. They were killing people for no reasons, oppressing people and trying to make everyday life harder and harder. That was causing my family to choose for me to flee Afghanistan.”

The family pooled money for Arif to escape…”there was not even a single office in my area of any international government or organisation. Impossible.” His father made a deal with people smugglers on the ground in Afghanistan. Arif was then taken with a group of people to Pakistan and “from there my journey starts.”

Traveling under a false passport, he flew to Indonesia where he spent three months in hiding before boarding a small boat bound for Australia. Suitable for 20 people, but with 80 on board, the boat’s engines stopped working after 6 hours at sea. It was night and the vessel began taking on water. Two of his friends drowned before reaching land.  Arif returned to Jakarta where other Afghan asylum seekers were arrested by Indonesian police. While there, he became aware of the Tampa Affair where in 2001, 400 asylum seekers were picked up from their sinking vessel by the Norwegian container ship Tampa and then refused entry to Australia. He also learned of the Howard Government’s Pacific Solution, which saw those refugees set offshore to places including Nauru.

“We heard the news about the Pacific Solution, about the (Australian) Government trying to stop people coming by boat, but    we still had no choice. We couldn’t go   back to Afghanistan”

After a month in hiding, he boarded another small boat that was soon intercepted off Christmas Island by a large Australian Customs vessel. Women and children were taken aboard the customs ship, while Arif and many other men were detained aboard their boat for 13 days…

“This was a really difficult part of my journey coming to Australia. We were prisoners. The fishing boat was very cramped. They didn’t allow us to move freely and we were watched the whole time. We even had to wait for permission to go to the toilet…some people that spoke out were then sleep deprived. It was like torture.”

The Australian authorities tried to fix the boat to send it back to Indonesia, but it started leaking and was deemed too dangerous. The remaining passengers were transferred to the customs ship and after two days, they were detained at Christmas Island detention centre, which was still being built at the time. After two months on Christmas Island, they were transferred to Nauru, arriving on December 22, 2001. They were initially interviewed by the Australian Department of Immigration and refused refugee status. Many people were wrongly classified as Pakistani, reportedly due to inept interpreters working for the Australian Government. Arif too was initially classified as Pakistani.

Many of my friends were sent back to Afghanistan and were killed.”

So began a long period of detention on Nauru that was to last until June 2005. Over this period, Arif and other detainees had no access to telephones or the Internet; in fact, no access to the outside world. Arif estimates that there were over 100 children also in detention, ranging in age from 1 to 17 years old. One young boy was detained on Nauru, his mother had died and he was separated from his father who was in Australia under a Temporary Protection Visa (TPV). After three years, the boy was repatriated with his father.

The detention centre on Nauru was funded and administrated by a body called The International Organisation for Migration (IOM) and Chubb were contracted for security. Arif said he and others were told repeatedly by Australian authorities (during the Howard years):

“If you don’t go back to Afghanistan, we will send you back by force.” 

“We were living in constant fear of being deported by force”, said Arif. Many detainees arrived on Nauru with chronic PTSD (Post Traumatic stress Disorder), while others also developed other severe psychological problems and had no access to treatment. Hunger strikes were also symptomatic of people’s acute distress.

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was finally able to visit detainees an Nauru in 2004. This prompted the Australian Department of Immigration to interview individual detainees – Arif was among 29 Afghan asylum seekers whose cases were rejected. He was told by Australian officials that they had reached a new agreement with the Afghan Government whereby he and other remaining Afghan refugees would be sent back. After an agonising delay, Arif was later told that he would be accepted after all, and gained entry to Australia under a TPV, arriving in June 2005. Under the terms of these visas, refugees were denied the right to travel and there was no right of even temporary family reunion.

Arif was granted permanent residency in 2008 and lives in Perth, where he talks of the relationships he has made with local people:

“I am very thankful to them: they have helped me a lot. I will be thankful to them forever.”

Asked about his experiences and the plight of other refugees, Arif Ruhani said:

“It is very difficult to express how I feel. I would definitely say to anybody who will read this, please, please help these   people. These people are putting their lives at risk for a safe life, for peace and for freedom.”

Every community and ethnic group has its own style of idiosyncrasy. They each display some strange inexplicable, even illogical habit or belief that makes an outsider shake their head in puzzlement. The Australian idiosyncrasy is the adulation and ownership of our tall poppies. In the same manner that football supporters talk of how “we” showed that other mob, we like to transfer dreams of power and affluence from the tall poppy to ourselves. “We could do that entrepreneurship ourselves if we really wanted to couldn’t we?”
As community members each of our households is required to pay a fee for dumping our rubbish in our local tips. This fee covers the costs of management, disposal and the retention of toxic runoff on site. Likewise industries wanting to dump their waste in landfill, and in some cases the ocean, are required to pay a fee.
Why then is getting our biggest polluters to pay for dumping their waste in the atmosphere such a difficult concept for us to accept? The simple answer is the big boys and girl want all of us to pay for their waste disposal and are prepared to spend a lot of money on buying political and media influence. Both of these groups set out to bamboozle us with misleading arguments and artful sophistry that suggests that such an impost on these demigods is an injustice equivalent to the crucifixion of Jesus. In fact we should be paying them some of our taxes to help them feel better about having to deal with emissions.
They are also able to enlist or buy the support of economically illiterate union leaders who are caught up in the mantra that a dumping levee will cost jobs. In some cases a union is given preferred access on a worksite because in this and many other matters its representatives are more compliant.
All of the above is understandable, after all Australian businesses are not known to be charitable or ecologically responsible, and they and our political parties have always preferred to have the community cater to their needs rather than the reverse.
What is difficult to understand is why so many in the community are lining up to support the polluters. Are Australian voters so irrational that they are not capable of understanding what is in their own best interest or is some other cause having them putting their hands in their pockets to pay for our billionaires waste management?
Air pollution costs us a fortune as it is causes more of us to die than car accidents as well as causing many to suffer from a chronic non fatal illness. In addition it poisons our waterways and our land, dropping agriculture yields by about four percent. Of course the costs of climate change in terms of lower rainfall in the South West of Australia and floods and cyclones in the North costs billions of dollars. Given the increasing loss of bio-diversity it could also end up wiping out the human race.
So come on Aussies come on, dip your hands in your pockets for Andrew and Gina and Clive. They need your help to resist the greedy government. Wouldn’t it be sad if they had to sell one of their holiday homes in Aspen or one or two of their Picasso’s? How could they be really important and iconic celebrities with such strictures placed on their lifestyles? We would all be diminished and embarrassed by such a circumstance.

“Brothers, sisters, we don’t need that fascist groove thang.”

Tony Abbot continues with his mantra of ‘Stop the Boats’, once again demonising the defenceless and making potlitical capital from their plight. As if those fleeing the ravages of war and persecution are anything but deserving of democracy’s protection. This is as illogical and spiteful as demonising the victims of accidents or natural disasters. Actually, perhaps it’s even worse. That victims of war and oppression are burdened by the scorn and intolerance of people in relatively free, wealthy countries is odious and craven.

Errr, hang on a sec Mr Abbott: what would you do if you and your family were awakened by the armies of the night? Would you not seek sanctuary and shelter?

Revisionism in the Land of the Parallel Universe

After listening to or reading what is called the news, have you found yourself questioning your memory and even your sanity? Have you had a strong feeling that what you read or heard this morning is wrong and your recollection was something entirely different. Perhaps an anti-thought like Dr Edward Teller’s anti-matter has popped into your brain from the parallel universe.

I am here to tell you that you are not alone. This phenomenon is shared by me and others. In fact in recent days on hearing the leader of the Australian opposition Tony Abbott speaking about the wonderful Liberal “Pacific Solution” for refugees, memories came flooding back to me from the parallel universe in which I had previously lived.

Tony Abbott spoke of a warm friendly and pacifying solution in which the Howard Government had set up an idyllic holiday camp on Nauru where refugees could recover after fleeing from conflicts involving mass murder and mass rapes. Unfortunately my recollection is rather more dark, sinister and brutal.
My memory insists that many refugees fled from a phony and illegal war in Iraq and another war fought in the wrong country for the wrong reason. In both wars Australia was a cheerful and dutiful participant. A third war was being fought in the old communist state of Yugoslavia and of course many stateless Palestinians violently driven from homes by the Israelis were seeking a new place to live. What all these conflicts had in common was that the principal victims were Muslims.

Like the European Jews who fled from Hitler these Muslim refugees were not welcomed and were treated with suspicion by Western Governments. Ministers from the Howard Government headed by the unconscionable Peter Reith told or rather lied to the Australian people that these awful refugees had thrown their children overboard in order to force their way into Australia. In the wake of September 11, it was also suggested that some might be terrorists carrying bombs. Such was the concern of the Howard Government for the well being of these war victims that when a Norwegian ship rescued a sinking boat full of refugees, Howard sent a group of commandos to commandeer the ship to prevent it returning them to the Australian mainland. I suppose it was his way of making them feel at home.

These refugees were a blessing for a Howard Government struggling in the polls and facing an election. Following the example of World War Two Germany, the Liberals looked around for scapegoat, enemies for the mighty John Howard to protect us from. In this atmosphere the Pacific Solution was born. Howard, Ruddock and Reith had a scapegoat and it was foreign, dark skinned and Muslim, so few votes would be lost in its implementation.
Overnight refugees became “illegal immigrants”. They were “flooding into our country” and they were “clogging up the courts” with their appeals. Unlike the asylum seekers who flew in by plane these “illegal boat people” were “queue jumping” security threats. “They could be carrying bombs”. Most importantly the principle issue was not the safety of these victims of war and instead the focus went on to the wicked “people smugglers” who were both a new scapegoat and a potent salve for the right wing conscience.

So how could the refugees be prevented from telling the true story to the Australian public? They must be separated. How could we prevent them from exercising their human rights in the courts and how could they be prevented from reaching Australia? Both could be achieved by interception offshore and landing them at first on islands that had been declared to be no longer part of Australia for the purpose of the Immigration Act. This was the real reason for offshore processing. It would mean no protection for refugees under Australian law.
These asylum seekers, including women and children, who were threatening our security would be put as far away as possible. The island of Nauru was perfect. This would remove them from public view and the scrutiny of the few journalists who can still tell the truth from a bucket of detritus and importantly, who were capable of writing their own words rather than quoting the spinmeisters.
There you have it: the successful Pacific solution. It worked perfectly after all. John Howard did win the election and a blueprint had been created to win future elections.

Here’s the recipe – lie and deceive resolutely; show your strength by vilifying, silencing and crushing a defenceless minority; divert the populace from the real debate.

As for the refugees, they suffered long term imprisonment and their children were mentally damaged. In the end though almost all of them were recognised as genuine refugees and became Australian citizens. The financial cost and the damage to our national psyche has been immense.
Did this really happen and are you pacified or are you horrified? Do you have these fleeting memories of a different time when you believed your government and the press? Does the truth mean more to you than being comfortably numb?
Welcome to the underworld.

The following is an extract from Andrew Rawnsley’s ‘The End of the Party’ – as associate editor and chief political commentator of the Observer, he details the key components of how Blair contrived and sold the dodgy dossier re alleged Iraq WMD in September 2002:

“The intelligence chiefs had succumbed to the frenzied and insidious pressure from the Prime Minister and his senior staff to deliver the goods. The propagandist Campbell supervised the spinning of thin, dated and flaky material to make the threat look real, new and urgent. The lawyer Blair then further buried all the caveats and uncertainties to present the dossier with his trademark evangelical certainty. Then pro-war elements of the media inflated the claims into the scariest headlines they could contrive.” 

(The End of the Party, Viking Penguin, 2010)

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. After you read this, you should delete and write your own post, with a new title above. Or hit Add New on the left (of the admin dashboard) to start a fresh post.

Here are some suggestions for your first post.

  1. You can find new ideas for what to blog about by reading the Daily Post.
  2. Add PressThis to your browser. It creates a new blog post for you about any interesting  page you read on the web.
  3. Make some changes to this page, and then hit preview on the right. You can alway preview any post or edit you before you share it to the world.